Management:
Panasonic will reportedly withdraw from the
plasma TV business in 2014. The withdrawal is a wise decision because the
company recorded a consolidated net loss of more than 700 billion yen two
consecutive years. The cumulative investment of more than 500 billion yen will
fall into oblivion with the discontinuation of the plasma TV business. Panasonic
launched a plasma TV in 1997 with the hope that it would replace the
cathode-ray tube TV. However, the plasma TV was outdone by the liquid crystal display
(LCD) TV, and it has currently a market share of less than 10%. The
extraordinary low market share means everything. (Photo) Panasonic's plant for plasma TVs. (Photo) The world largest plasma dispaly by Panasonic
Even though Panasonic is a huge company, it
is totally useless and hardly possible to continue the plasma TV business and LCD
TV business simultaneously, given the fact that the former is plagued by such an
extremely low market share. The TV business is so huge, and TV is a commodity
now. Even though Japanese TVs are famous for high quality, long durability, and
multiple functions, they can hardly compete successfully with amazingly
low-priced TVs from Korea
and China.
At present, the greatest TV market is not advanced countries but newly
industrialized countries where price speaks for itself. The Panasonic case
gives the lesson that a company is too small to please everyone in the global
market. It can be said that Samsung of Korea, which focused on LCD TV to become
the market leader, realized this fact earlier than Japanese electronics giants.
The same is true in the ongoing merger
trend of the shipbuilding business. The merger between Kawasaki Heavy and
Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding did not materialize. In view of the growing competition and
shrinking sales, pursuing economies of scale is vital for survival. As in the
case of the TV business, Japan
will clearly have to survive tough competition with strenuous efforts to launch
competitively-priced products. It is a matter of concern that most Japanese
companies are satisfied with the current status because they are increasing
sales. However, what is most important is the share in the market. If a company
decreased the share because competitors increased sales more than it did, it
has to hold a meeting for reflection instead of a banquet for celebration. A decreased
market share is a red signal asking a company to be alert. (Photo) A double hull ship built by Mitsui Engineering
and Shipbuilding
In Europe,
it is not unusual that two companies headquartered in two different countries
merge in pursuit of economies of sales. In a sense, today is the days of cross
border alliance. Knowing the amazing growth of Samsung of Korea, Japan is
somewhat slow in reorganizing and integrating its domestic business structure.
Perhaps, it may originate from the Japanese culture that asks us Japanese to
stick to the importance of “Never give up.” As time goes by, we have to change
of our value to survive in the day of global competition. Like it or not, profits
tend to concentrate in leading companies in the world market. As Jack Welch of
GE told, “No company can survive unless it is the market leader or the market
follower.” His thoughtful insight seems to give a warning about the current
situation of Japanese companies. In this sense, Daikin that focuses on
air-conditioners and develops its competitive edge with steady and continuous efforts
to expand business worldwide seems to give a good example to follow.
Daikin's latest air-conditioner
featured by advanced technology